bookoff-mcandrewsgoogleplus--whitelinkedin--whitevcard

Biography

Andrew Yeretsky’s practice includes preparing and prosecuting patent applications, representing clients in post-grant proceedings, and general patent counseling. Andrew works with a wide variety of electrical and mechanical technologies, including, but not limited to display devices, digital multimedia broadcasting, networking, computer hardware, computer software, video coding, video compression, artificial intelligence, and internet of things (IOT).

Prior to joining BoMc, Andrew practiced law at a leading intellectual property boutique law firm in Washington, D.C. Before that, Andrew was a patent examiner at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), where he examined patents related to display devices including liquid crystal display (LCD) devices, organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display devices, three-dimensional (3D) display devices, display drivers, capacitive and resistive touchscreens, graphical user interfaces (GUI), eye tracking devices, and virtual reality (VR) devices.

Highlights

  • Handled the global portfolio for a Fortune 500 leader in smartphone and display technologies.
  • Prosecuted hundreds of patent applications for a global leader in telecommunications and consumer electronics.
  • Interned at a technology company that is a leading designer of microprocessor architectures used in almost all mobile devices.

Bar Admissions

  • District of Columbia
  • Kansas
  • Missouri
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Education

  • University of Kansas School of Law, J.D., 2006
  • University of Texas at Austin, B.S., Electrical Engineering & Computer Engineering, 2002

Publications

  • Contributor. “The Essential Case Law Guide to PTAB Trials,” 2018.
  • Author. “Summary Analysis of Nidec Motor Corp. v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co. Ltd.,” Sughrue Mion Blog, April 10, 2017.
  • Author. “Secondary considerations demand primary attention,” Sughrue Mion Blog, February 11, 2015.
  • Coauthor. “Computer Software Inventions: Patent Eligibility under Alice & Recent Trends in Means-plus-function limitations,” AIPPI, Journal of the Japanese Group, Vol. 60, No. 6, 2015.
  • Author. “Summary Analysis of EPOS Technologies Ltd. v. Pegasus Technologies Ltd.,” Sughrue Mion Blog, November 15, 2014.
  • Author. “Summary Analysis of American Calcar, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.,” Sughrue Mion Blog, November 15, 2014.

Organizations

  • American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), Member